<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bewildered Society &#187; Tropic Thunder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bewilderedsociety.com/blog/tag/tropic-thunder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bewilderedsociety.com</link>
	<description>fabulously cynical.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 04:56:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>[Be that as it may ...] &#8216;10&#8242; not the magic number for Oscar</title>
		<link>http://www.bewilderedsociety.com/blog/2009/06/10-not-the-magic-number/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bewilderedsociety.com/blog/2009/06/10-not-the-magic-number/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Will O'Hargan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Be that as it may ...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iron Man]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Dark Knight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tropic Thunder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall-E]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bewilderedsociety.com/?p=2868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few days ago it was announced by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences that their awards&#8211;commonly referred to as The Oscars&#8211;would have not five but ten nominees for the best picture Oscar.  The reaction was decidedly mixed, with many of the detractors suggesting that the new rules will add to the already [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">A few days ago it was announced by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences that their awards&#8211;commonly referred to as The Oscars&#8211;would have not five but ten nominees for the best picture Oscar.  The reaction was decidedly <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/arts/la-et-oscars25-2009jun25,0,46153.story?page=2">mixed</a>, with <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/29/business/29carr.html?ref=business">many</a> of the <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/movies/ci_12683273">detractors</a> suggesting that the new rules will add to the already long broadcast while merely increasing the number of art house nominations.<br />
<a href="http://www.bewilderedsociety.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/wall-e-oscar.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-2868];player=img;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2869" title="WALL-E with an Oscar" src="http://www.bewilderedsociety.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/wall-e-oscar.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="227" /></a><br />
If the expressed purpose is to get more genre films such as Wall-E (above) or The Dark Knight in the mix, as <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/arts/la-et-oscars25-2009jun25,0,46153.story">this</a> L.A. Times article suggests, then will expanding the field really help? It&#8217;s too early to see what this year holds, but let&#8217;s go back through the last ten years and see what the Best Picture races could have looked like with 10 nominees. After reading <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-oscars-backlash26-2009jun26,1,5902994.story" target="_self">this</a>, and getting a better understanding for how the field is selected, I have tried my best to determine who would make the final ten films.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span id="more-2868"></span></p>
<h1 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #993300;"><strong>2009</strong></span></h1>
<p><strong>The actual field: </strong><em>Slumdog Millionare</em>, Milk, The Reader, The Curious Case of Benjiman Button, Frost/Nixon<br />
<strong>The expanded field:</strong> The Dark Knight, Wall-E, Doubt, The Wrestler, The Visitor</p>
<p>This past year was the year that caused the change, and it seems fairly obvious, seeing as how two major crowdpleasing films&#8211;The Dark Knight and Wall-E&#8211;would both be added to the mix. While I feel The Dark Knight was the closest to being nominated (it was even on my <a href="http://www.bewilderedsociety.com/blog/2009/01/oscar-nomination-predictions/" target="_blank">prediction sheet</a>), I feel Wall-E would have the best chance to do some damage in the category. First off, it would be very hard to explain leaving Wall-E off a list of the ten best pictures of 2008. Second, it&#8217;s populist message could have given voters an uplifting choice in the category outside of Slumdog and made the race really, really interesting. This is a year that needed eight or nine nominees.</p>
<p><strong>Who&#8217;s still outside looking in: </strong>There&#8217;s no way Iron Man or Tropic Thunder was going to get nominated here. However, The Visitor could easily be replaced by Gran Torino. Or Rachel Getting Married. Or Revolutionary Road. There&#8217;s also the possibility that Man on Wire or Waltz With Bashier could have snuck in here as well. This was a year with a ton of real nomination possibilities.</p>
<h1 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #993300;"><strong>2008</strong></span></h1>
<p><strong>The actual field: </strong><em>No Country for Old Men, </em>There Will Be Blood, Juno, Atonement, Michael Clayton<br />
<strong>The expanded field:</strong> The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, Away From Her, Ratatouille, Eastern Promises, The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford</p>
<p>If there was ever a year that five was just the right number of nominees, this would be the year. While Ratatouille was the best reviewed film of the year, and the absence of The Diving Bell and the Butterfly is curious at best, from the moment the nominees were announced it was clear that it was a two horse race between No Country for Old Men and There Will Be Blood.</p>
<p><strong>Who&#8217;s still outside looking in: </strong>The big one is The Bourne Ultimatium. It was hard to exclude it, but it is hard to imagine an academy voter listing it as the number one film of the year. I&#8217;m Not There or Before the Devil Knows Your Dead could replace Eastern Promises and The Assassination of Jesse James. There is also a slim chance that enough voters could have come together to get Once a nomination, but it seems unlikely.</p>
<h1 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #993300;"><strong>2007</strong></span></h1>
<p><strong>The actual field: </strong><em>The Departed,</em> Babel, The Queen, Little Miss Sunshine, Letters from Iwo Jima<br />
<strong>The expanded field:</strong> United 93, Dreamgirls, Pan&#8217;s Labyrinth, The Lives of Others, Children of Men</p>
<p>Another year where no mainstream box office smash gets in with the expansion. United 93 and Pan&#8217;s Labyrinth were shoe-ins, and the rest of the field was pretty obvious. This is another year, like 2009, where around eight films might have made for a more interesting race. Honestly, had United 93 or Pan&#8217;s Labyrinth been nominated (and Academy voters made to watch them) they would have been favorites to upset The Departed.</p>
<p><strong>Who&#8217;s still outside looking in: </strong>Borat, Little Children, Blood Diamond, The Last King of Scotland and Flags of Our Fathers.</p>
<h1 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #993300;"><strong>2006</strong></span></h1>
<p><strong>The actual field: </strong><em>Crash, </em>Good Night and Good Luck, Capote, Brokeback Mountain, Munich<br />
<strong>The expanded field:</strong> Syriana, A History of Violence, The Constant Gardener, The Squid and the Whale, Pride and Prejudice</p>
<p>While all ten films deserved to be in the running, this seems to be a year where the opposite of what the Academy would have intended by the new voting rules would have happened&#8211;five more art films with no chance of mainstream interest. Quite frankly, the nominations were more popular and talked about than the films left out.</p>
<p><strong>Who&#8217;s still outside looking in: </strong>King Kong and Walk the Line. Two good films that I couldn&#8217;t see racking up the weighted votes needed to get in.</p>
<h1 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #993300;"><strong>2005</strong></span></h1>
<p><strong>The actual field: </strong><em>Million Dollar Baby, </em>Ray, The Aviator, Finding Neverland, Sideways<br />
<strong>The expanded field:</strong> Vera Drake, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Hotel Rwanda, Before Sunset, The Incredibles</p>
<p>I almost didn&#8217;t include The Incredibles, but I was certain someone would put it as the best picture of the year and almost everyone would include it in the top ten. Eternal Sunshine is a youth film, but not exactly mainstream. And, while two stricktly art-house films were added, it seems 2005 would be a good year for 10 nominees.</p>
<p><strong>Who&#8217;s still outside looking in: </strong>Closer, Kinsey, Kill Bill Vol. 2, Spider-Man 2.</p>
<h1 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #993300;"><strong>2004</strong></span></h1>
<p><strong>The actual field: </strong><em>Lord of the Rings: Return of the King</em>, Master and Commander, Lost in Translation, Mystic River, Seabiscuit<br />
<strong>The expanded field:</strong> City of God, Finding Nemo, Cold Mountain, In America, American Splendor</p>
<p>Nemo and City of God are obvious inclusions, and the support for Cold Mountain and In America went wide. American Splendor would get in via it&#8217;s massive support among writers and the more quarky film crowd in the academy that became more powerful in the following years.</p>
<p><strong>Who&#8217;s still outside looking in: </strong>Big Fish was a big hit with moviegoers, but not with critics and didn&#8217;t have much Oscar buzz at all. Pirates of the Caribbean never had a shot, though The Fog of War might have snuck in.</p>
<h1 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #993300;"><strong>2003</strong></span></h1>
<p><strong>The actual field: </strong><em>Chicago, </em>The Hours, The Pianist, Gangs of New York, Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers<br />
<strong>The expanded field:</strong> Talk to Her, y tu mama tambien, Far From Heaven, Adaptation, Spirited Away</p>
<p>In a year the Academy couldn&#8217;t find one good film to nominate isn&#8217;t helped much, at least as far as public interest goes, by adding another five. Adaptation is the most known on that list, and your average movie patron probably thinks of it of that movie where Nicolas Cage wears a fat-suit.</p>
<p><strong>Who&#8217;s still outside looking in: </strong>Minority Report, About Schmidt, Bloody Sunday.</p>
<h1 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #993300;"><strong>2002</strong></span></h1>
<p><strong>The actual field: </strong><em>A Beautiful Mind, </em>Godsford Park, Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, Moulin Rouge, In The Bedroom<br />
<strong>The expanded field:</strong> Memento, Mulholland Drive, Amelile, Black Hawk Down, Ali</p>
<p>For a serious filmgoer, the addition of Lynch&#8217;s Mulholland, Scott&#8217;s Black Hawk Down and Nolan&#8217;s Memento would have been awesome, but the average Oscar-watcher would rather see Shrek in the mix.</p>
<p><strong>Who&#8217;s still outside looking in: </strong>Shrek, A.I., The Royal Tenenbaums.</p>
<h1 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #993300;"><strong>2001</strong></span></h1>
<p><strong>The actual field: </strong><em>Gladiator,</em> Traffic, Chocolat, Erin Brockovich, Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon<br />
<strong>The expanded field:</strong> Billy Elliott, Almost Famous, Wonder Boys, You Can Count on Me, Chicken Run</p>
<p>A bizarre year where the five films left out are more memorable that those that were nominated. I almost forgot about Chicken Run, which would have been on nearly everyone&#8217;s top ten list from that year, and certainly at least one voters top pick (though probably an animator).</p>
<p><strong>Who&#8217;s still outside looking in: </strong>Thirteen Days, Pollack, Requiem For A Dream, High Fidelity, O Brother, Where Art Thou?</p>
<h1 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #993300;"><strong>2000</strong></span></h1>
<p><strong>The actual field: </strong><em>American Beauty</em>, The Insider, The Green Mile, The Sixth Sense, The Cider House Rules<br />
<strong>The expanded field:</strong> Being John Malkovich, Magnolia, Boys Don&#8217;t Cry, Girl Interrupted, The Talented Mr. Ripley</p>
<p>Perhaps the only year where the award isn&#8217;t slightly cheapened by 10 nominees (though eight would still be more ideal). It still doesn&#8217;t provide much of a chance for non-art house films to join the nominees, instead piling up good but largely unseen films in the nominations.</p>
<p><strong>Who&#8217;s still outside looking in: </strong>Toy Story 2 and Three Kings were the next two films on my list. Hell, 12 nominees wouldn&#8217;t have been bad in 1999.</p>
<p>In conclusion, outside of 2009, a couple of serious but not too serious action films and a small ton of nominations for Pixar, expanding the film, as far as I see it, would not add too many major films to the mix. There&#8217;s always the possibility of a major crowd pleaser coming along to throw a wrench in the gears, but don&#8217;t expect lighthearted summer fare like Star Trek or Iron Man to be mixing it up with the Art films anytime in the not-too-distant future. And no, <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/the_big_picture/2009/06/oscar-shocker-could-the-hangover-get-a-best-picture-nomination.html">L.A. Times</a>, The Hangover will not be getting a best picture nomination.</p>
<br/>Originally Posted to <a href="http://www.bewilderedsociety.com/blog/2009/06/10-not-the-magic-number/">BewilderedSociety.com</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bewilderedsociety.com/blog/2009/06/10-not-the-magic-number/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[LOLZ!] Five Best One Liners/Jokes of 2008 in Media (so far)</title>
		<link>http://www.bewilderedsociety.com/blog/2008/09/five-best-one-linersjokes-of-2008-in-media-so-far/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bewilderedsociety.com/blog/2008/09/five-best-one-linersjokes-of-2008-in-media-so-far/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Will O'Hargan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LOLZ!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burn After Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[list]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Dark Knight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tropic Thunder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bewilderedsociety.com/blog/?p=1662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[5. &#8220;I&#8217;m the dude, playing the dude, disguised as the other dude!&#8221; &#8211; Kirk Lazarus (Robert Downey Jr.) in Tropic Thunder. He shows he really has no clue who he is as the Australian playing an African American who was also in disguise to break into the enemy camp.

4. &#8220;I&#8217;m thirsty&#8221; &#8211; Ben Linus (Michael [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5. &#8220;I&#8217;m the dude, playing the dude, disguised as the other dude!&#8221; &#8211; Kirk Lazarus (Robert Downey Jr.) in <em>Tropic Thunder</em>. He shows he really has no clue who he is as the Australian playing an African American who was also in disguise to break into the enemy camp.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xgsVNMD9Ae8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xgsVNMD9Ae8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>4. &#8220;I&#8217;m thirsty&#8221; &#8211; Ben Linus (Michael Emerson) on <em>LOST.</em> In this tense clip Locke (Terry O&#8217;Quinn) offers his former ally and current prisoner Sayid (Naveen Andrews) some iced tea. Ben speaks up, but is ignored.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/h0mxcmPvbiI&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/h0mxcmPvbiI&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>3. &#8220;The hammer is my penis.&#8221; &#8211; Captain Hammer (Nathan Fillion) in <em>Dr. Horrible&#8217;s Sing-Along Blog</em>. Neil Patrick Harris plays Dr. Horrible, arch-enemy of Captain Hammer who happens to be in a relationship with the girl Dr. Horrible is madly in love with, Penny. Captain Hammer teases Horrible about how he&#8217;s going to have sex with, when this gem comes in.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JULyx-wZih8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JULyx-wZih8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>2. &#8220;You think that&#8217;s a Schwinn&#8221; -Chad Felmheimer (Brad Pitt) in <em>Burn After Reading</em>. Clip gives pretty good context. Line is about 2:12 in.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/03XHY1ApZWo&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/03XHY1ApZWo&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>1. &#8220;Ta Da! It&#8217;s&#8230;it&#8217;s gone!&#8221; &#8211; The Joker (Heath Ledger) from <em>The Dark Knight</em>.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2KX3OriDpgg&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2KX3OriDpgg&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>Agree? Disagree? What did I forget? Let me know.</p>
<br/>Originally Posted to <a href="http://www.bewilderedsociety.com/blog/2008/09/five-best-one-linersjokes-of-2008-in-media-so-far/">BewilderedSociety.com</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bewilderedsociety.com/blog/2008/09/five-best-one-linersjokes-of-2008-in-media-so-far/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

